The logistics corridor as a strategic asset: Infrastructure is strategic, but is our governance?

Global communication network. Source: iStock

19 June 2026

This piece is a short reflection on whether Europe's approach to governing its transport corridors matches the ambition of its transport corridor strategy. The EU's updated FDI screening framework provides a timely prompt: if foreign influence over logistics infrastructure can accumulate through many instruments—equity ownership, state loans, construction contracts, warehousing, data platforms, etc.—and across multiple jurisdictions at once, are existing frameworks asking the right questions at the right level?

By Jeanne Albin - LandRisk Manager

The recent adoption of a regulation revising the EU Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) framework presented a good opportunity for a wider reflection on the status and importance of freight corridors.

European officials have long framed the EU's transport corridor strategy in explicitly geopolitical terms: connectivity as a geostrategic project, offering strategic alternatives to dependence, strengthening supply chain security, and reinforcing continental stability. It is a compelling vision. But it raises an immediate question. If the nodes along those corridors (terminals, intermodal hubs, logistics facilities, etc.) are owned, controlled, or influenced by foreign state-linked entities, does the strategy deliver the sovereignty it promises?

It should be noted that none of this is inherently illegitimate: foreign involvement in logistics infrastructure is a standard feature of open economies. The question is not whether individual investments warrant suspicion, but whether their aggregate effect is something European strategy has fully reckoned with.

The mechanisms of influence are varied, and that variety may precisely be a problem. Influence can accumulate through equity stakes in port terminals, state-backed construction and financing arrangements, warehouse acquisitions, operational service agreements, and data platform integration—and these instruments often work in combination rather than isolation. The pattern is visible across different parts of the logistics chain: port positions serving as anchors for inland block train services; foreign state-linked firms quietly expanding their warehousing footprint across the UK, Germany, Poland, and Italy at increasing (in some cases, record) levels; and, undergirding it all, data platforms creating structural incentives to integrate those dispersed assets into unified national visibility systems. What makes this strategically significant is not any single investment, but the cumulative character of the whole—incremental positioning across an integrated corridor, assembled through different instruments and in different jurisdictions, in ways that no single review is designed to assess.

This is the strategic logic that existing frameworks may not be fully calibrated to capture. Individual assets can appear commercially rational while the aggregate pattern of ownership, financing, and operational dependency across a corridor creates conditions that a determined actor could, under adverse circumstances, choose to exploit. The question is not whether any single arrangement is problematic, but whether Europe is assembling transport infrastructure whose strategic autonomy is structurally compromised before the first geopolitical test arrives.

If Europe’s transport corridors are intended to advance resilience and strategic autonomy, scrutiny must be calibrated to the corridors themselves, not only to the individual assets that compose them. The challenge is to develop governance frameworks that match the architecture of the networks and the full range of instruments through which influence over them accumulates.

📢LandRisk Logistics:

Discover how LandRisk Logistics can assist in protecting your supply chain against evolving security threats

Contact us to learn about customised, intelligence-driven strategies designed to enhance resilience and safeguard your operations. Our team collaborates closely with clients to identify vulnerabilities and develop practical solutions tailored to their specific challenges. Proactive engagement is essential to mitigate risks and ensure continuity. Get in touch today to stay ahead of potential disruptions.